Zachary Schrag writes:
Thank you for bringing attention to the debate about research ethics and IRB oversight of the social sciences the Monkey Cage blog.
I hope you can help spread the word about an unprecedented opportunity for social scientists to reshape the federal regulations that govern IRBs.
On 26 July 2011, the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in coordination with the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM), opening up the Common Rule regulations on human subjects protections for substantial revision. The ANPRM concedes that there are problems with the way IRBs review social science, and notes that “Overregulating social and behavioral research in general may serve to distract attention from attempts to identify those social and behavioral research studies that do pose threats to the welfare of subjects and thus do merit significant oversight.” [emphasis added]
This notice signals the greatest opportunity in thirty years for social scientists to reshape federal IRB policy.
So far, however, I have not seen much about this from political scientists; for example, the American Political Science Association website seems not to have posted even a news item.
I wonder if you could suggest ways to alert the political science community. Comments are due before 5pm, eastern time, on 26 September 2011, so time is short.
The ANPRM is quite complex and poses 74 questions, many of them of relatively little interest to political scientists and other social scientists. To make things easier on social science organizations, I have posted a quick guide at
I have also posted additional commentary and links to news articles at Institutional Review Blog, http://www.institutionalreviewblog.com/