The Ideology of John Paul Stevens

by John Sides on April 9, 2010 · 4 comments

in Judicial

stevensideology.png

Source: Martin-Quinn scores.

{ 4 comments }

Matt Dhaiti April 9, 2010 at 4:40 pm

i don’t see how the court won’t shift further to the right after someone (kagan) gets appointed, no one as left as stevens is getting passed the senate.

MMJ April 10, 2010 at 12:48 am

It’s sad to think of the court shifting to the right under President Obama… but I too am worried that Obama won’t dare go more liberal than Stevens.

Kevin Evans April 11, 2010 at 12:21 am

Both of the previous comments are probably right that the next appointment will not be as liberal as Stevens, but that doesn’t necessarily mean anything will change in terms of decision-making on the Court. As long as the appointee is to the left of the liberal “rule of four” pivot there is reason to believe that very little will change in terms of what cases are granted cert and the overall outcome of decisions (at least from a perspective that transposes something akin to “pivotal politics” onto the SC).

So, in the end, it probably won’t be too bad for liberals. But, goodness knows that I’ve been wrong before…

Also, I always get a good chuckle out of the fact that Stevens was appointed by two Republicans (Nixon appointed him to the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit; Ford to the SC) and then he turned out to be so liberal (from a 0 to below a -2 in the graph above).

Forrest April 11, 2010 at 11:23 am

Even if Obama replaces Stevens with someone who is more conservative, there is no reason to expect Court outcomes to become more conservative. Stevens is not a pivotal justice.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: