Campaigning, governing, and the complexity of political speeches

by Andrew Gelman on March 9, 2010 · 1 comment

in Public opinion

Sanjay Srivista draws some interesting connections between a recent Obama speech and a paper by P. E. Tetlock published in a psychology journal in 1981 (!). In general, I think we as political scientists don’t interact enough with research in psychology.

{ 1 comment }

Talleyrand March 9, 2010 at 9:15 am

I agree. If you are looking for references:

Goldgeier, J., & Tetlock, P.E. (2001). Psychology and international relations theory. In N. Polsby(Ed.), Annual Review of Political Science, 2001, (vol. 4). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Press.

Tetlock, P.E., & Goldgeier, J. (2000). Human nature and world politics: Cognition, influence,and identity. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 87-96.

Goldgeier, J., & Tetlock, P.E. (2007). Psychological approaches complement, rather than contradict, international relations theories. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.) The OxfordHandbook of International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rose McDermott, Political Psychology in International Relations, University of Michigan Press, 2004.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: