A few days ago I blogged on the laughability of many vice-presidential nominees (John Edwards, Dan Quayle, Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin, Joe Biden, Aaron Burr, . . .), along with some hypotheses about what was going on. Jonathan Bernstein followed up with some thoughts of his own:
List A: Eagleton, Shriver, Dole, Ferraro, Quayle, Lieberman, PalinList B: Mondale, (George H.W.) Bush, Bentsen, Gore, Kemp, Edwards, Biden
List B are Vice Presidential nominees who had previously run for president, at least a little; List A are those nominees who had not run for president before their selection for the #2 spot . . . just on quick inspection there sure seems to be an enormous gap between the two lists, no? I think everyone on List B was regarded as a decent pick; there certainly are no wash-outs. List A, on the other hand, is a disaster area . . . If anyone wants to do an empirical study, I’d suggest checking for the word “dump” with the various nominees. I think you would come up positive for most of List A, and negative for everyone on List B.
Bernstein concludes:
If a presidential nominee asked me for advise about Vice, I’d tell him or her to make a short list limited to people who survived a presidential campaign with their reputations intact. Anything else is asking for trouble.
Interesting. And it’s good to know that somebody out there is reading the blog.
Comments on this entry are closed.