Polisci Valentines Contest!

by John Sides on February 14, 2012 · 46 comments

in Frivolity

A Monkey Cage reader has suggested some reply to the economics-themed valentines that Justin Wolfers summarizes here.  I made a half-hearted stab and then realized, “Hey, let’s make this a contest!”  Leave your suggestions in comments.   To get things started, here’s what I came up with in 10 minutes, including handy links to research where appropriate:

  • When it comes to you, I’ll never be a swing voter.

  • You and me are just like democracies.  Always at peace.

  • Our love is all surge and no decline.

  • You talk so sexy that I’ll never, ever invoke cloture.

 

{ 46 comments… read them below or add one }

Mike Wagner February 14, 2012 at 11:36 am

Our love will never dealign.

Reply

Moby Hick February 14, 2012 at 11:55 am

Let’s improve our equilibrium by playing an infinitely repeated game.

Reply

Mike Gruszczynski February 14, 2012 at 12:05 pm

You can set my agenda any time.

Reply

Moby Hick February 14, 2012 at 12:06 pm

I’d like our dyadic relationship to indicate a high level of reciprocity in the COW Project (Correlates of Wuv) data.

Reply

CDJ February 14, 2012 at 12:38 pm

When it comes to you I am a blind partisan, never ambivalent…

Reply

TSR February 14, 2012 at 12:46 pm

I would never want to gerrymander your curves

Reply

John February 14, 2012 at 12:55 pm

My approval of you will always be uncorrelated with the state of our economy.

Reply

J February 14, 2012 at 12:59 pm

No veto point could ever constrain our love.

Reply

Matt February 14, 2012 at 1:01 pm

Even though I’ve got the power of the purse, sweetheart, you are the unitary executive power in this relationship.

Reply

Aman Batheja February 14, 2012 at 1:07 pm

Will you join my coalition?

Reply

Joe Ura February 14, 2012 at 1:14 pm

The status quo is irrelevant. I always prefer to “spend more” time with you.

Reply

Trevor February 14, 2012 at 1:34 pm

Bradley has nothing on my polling effect.

Reply

zie February 14, 2012 at 1:34 pm

Let’s bowl together.

Reply

Steve February 14, 2012 at 1:44 pm

Let’s let our love trickle down to the whole world.

Reply

Carlisle Rainey February 14, 2012 at 1:50 pm

Our interaction is statistically significant.

Reply

Scott February 14, 2012 at 2:11 pm

A three-way interaction will never be necessary.

Reply

Trey February 14, 2012 at 2:14 pm

They’re just harder to interpret.

Reply

Andrew Therriault February 14, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Such a result would inevitably be perverse.

Reply

Andrew Therriault February 14, 2012 at 2:01 pm

Your effects on me are anything but minimal.

My love for you will never have to be imputed.

I might say I’m independent, but I’m really leaning toward you.

Can I reveal my latent preference? It’s you.

I love you like an old, wealthy, educated, residentially-immobile partisan loves voting.

Reply

Jackie February 14, 2012 at 2:07 pm

“It doesn’t matter if the Euro collapses, you’ll always be my Celtic Tiger.”

Reply

TSR February 14, 2012 at 2:17 pm

Let me preempt your words, my darling, and articulate just how much secular time I want to spend with you. There won’t be no disjunction, so we won’t need reconstruction. May our regimes be affiliated until the end of political time.

Reply

John Sides February 14, 2012 at 2:41 pm

These were submitted to me by a Friend of the Blog:

(From a DC voter:) If I had a vote, you’d get it.

No separation of powers for us.

May two budget proposals beat as one.

Occupy me.

Reply

RobC February 14, 2012 at 2:56 pm

I don’t know what’s the matter with Kansas, but there’s nothing the matter with yours.

Reply

JCryd February 14, 2012 at 3:07 pm

From a co-worker:

When it comes to you, I’ll never abstain.

Reply

Sarah February 14, 2012 at 3:54 pm

Let’s make a motion to recommit.

Reply

Moby Hick February 14, 2012 at 4:27 pm

Rose are red,
Violets are blue,
The availability heuristic
played no role in choosing you.

Reply

Jim Golby February 14, 2012 at 4:42 pm

There’s no dilemma, baby; I am a prisoner to your love. Just give me some cheap talk, and I’ll be ready to cooperate.

Or,

Looking into your eyes solved my commitment problem.

Reply

Steve February 14, 2012 at 5:31 pm

Baby I could filibuster you all night.

Reply

24601 February 14, 2012 at 5:33 pm

Join my coalition and I’ll fulfill all your intense demands

Reply

Tina Zappile February 14, 2012 at 6:12 pm

Your soft power won my love

You can be the hegemon of my world every day

I love you, it’s who I am (a constructivist)

Reply

Joe February 14, 2012 at 6:18 pm

Trust me, if we head back to my place I can support this anecdote with some hard data.

Reply

anon February 14, 2012 at 6:23 pm

No chain ganging nor buck-passing, I’m a one-man coalition of the willing.

Reply

Jack February 14, 2012 at 6:53 pm

“Oooh baby, your war chest actually ATTRACTS quality challengers.”

Reply

Seth February 14, 2012 at 7:06 pm

The first and second derivatives of my love for you are positive.

Let’s go research state legislatures together — no one’s looking there.

Time for me to exercise the pocket veto, if you catch my meaning.

Reply

Phillip February 14, 2012 at 7:47 pm

I’m really into models – let’s formalize this.

Reply

Dave Wiltse February 14, 2012 at 7:48 pm

When I look in your eyes I see stars more beautiful than a .001 p-value…

Reply

SR February 14, 2012 at 7:54 pm

“How about you and me process trace our way upstairs?”

“You make me hotter than a bus full of neocons at an arms fair”

Reply

Andy Civettini February 14, 2012 at 8:54 pm

My bureaucratic drift will always be toward your ideal position.

We’re such a good match we won’t have to go to conference.

Under what conditions would you accept my offer of friendly diplomatic relations?

Reply

Ali V. February 14, 2012 at 9:06 pm

My love for you will never regress to the mean.

Reply

Alex Williams February 14, 2012 at 11:26 pm

You matter at more than just the margins.

Reply

Alex Williams February 14, 2012 at 11:32 pm

The end of history ain’t the end of our story.

Reply

David February 15, 2012 at 3:38 am

Nobody has ever punctuated my equilibrium like you.

Reply

Ben February 15, 2012 at 2:21 pm

My proposal to you has an empty winset.

Reply

Anna February 14, 2013 at 3:35 pm

Baby, let’s iterate until we converge.

Reply

Joss February 14, 2013 at 3:54 pm

You had me at ‘Abstract’.

Reply

Maria Reyes February 14, 2013 at 4:38 pm

GOP is Red
Democrats are Blue
They think gridlock is sexy,
but they haven’t met you.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: