Home > News > The Democratic Deficit in the States
99 views 34 sec 0 Comment

The Democratic Deficit in the States

- October 10, 2011

Jeff Lax and Justin Phillips write:

We study how well states translate public opinion into policy. Using national surveys and advances in subnational opinion estimation, we estimate state-level support for 39 policies across eight issue areas, including abortion, law enforcement, health care, and education. We show that policy is highly responsive to policy-specific opinion, even controlling for other influences. But we also uncover a striking “democratic deficit”: policy is congruent with majority will only half the time. The analysis considers the influence of institutions, salience, partisan control of government, and interest groups on the magnitude and ideological direction of this democratic deficit. We find the largest influences to be legislative professionalization, term limits, and issue salience. Partisanship and interest groups affect the ideological balance of incongruence more than the aggregate degree thereof. Finally, policy is overresponsive to ideology and party—leading policy to be polarized relative to state electorates.

This is important work, both for its connection to political polarization and also regarding larger questions of representative democracy. At the level of methodology, I like that they look at many issue areas at once.

Also, they have some nice graphs.