Is Twitter Politically Polarized?

by Henry Farrell on July 27, 2011 · 2 comments

in IT and politics

Yes, according to a new paper by M. D. Conover, J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, B. Goncalves, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer (computer scientists are apparently big on the idea of not letting the world know what their first names are). But there still is some interesting interaction between Twitter users from different political perspectives.

The authors use an algorithm to identify 250,000 Twitter messages (from a database of 355 million tweets gathered over a six week period) with politically relevant hashtags, coming from about 45,000 users. What’s interesting is that they identify quite different dynamics as operating within two different communication networks. One network is composed of retweets – where one user simply retweets another’s message. Here, they find that this network is densely clustered, so that left-leaning people retweet messages from other leftwingers, and right-leaning people retweet messages from other rightwingers. However, there is a second network, composed of ‘mentions’ – where one Twitter user mentions another’s user name in order to communicate with him or her. This network is far more heterogenous, as can be seen from the figure below (the retweet network is linkmapped on the left, the mention network on the right). This can be interpreted with a positive or negative normative slant, depending.

Linkmaps of Twitter and Political Polarization

mentions and replies may serve as a conduit through which users are exposed to information and opinions they might not choose in advance. Despite this promising finding, the work of Yardi and boyd (2010) suggests that cross-ideological interactions may reinforce pre-existing in-group/out-group identities, exacerbating the problem of political polarization.

The authors lean towards the latter interpretation. They also generously provide their dataset (located at http://cnets.indiana.edu/groups/nan/truthy ) for others interested in exploring the “role of technologically-mediated political inter- action in deliberative democracy.”

{ 2 comments }

Gregory Rose July 27, 2011 at 1:41 pm

I just wrote today about how the reason why the internet isn’t good for winning campaigns is because they don’t find the people who actually decide who wins. That is independents, swing voters, whatever you want to call them.

While social networking sites are good for galvanizing and organizing your base, they can’t help you find those who you need. People on Twitter follow whoever they already agree with, not the ones they don’t.

Jonathan July 27, 2011 at 11:47 pm

As an Independent who doesn’t waste time on Twitter, I find myself agreeing strongly with Greg Rose here :) Actions in Washington and Neutral message boards to find me and my vote.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: